Safe withdrawal rate — three strategies, side by side, net of tax
Most SWR tools show one strategy, one start date, and pretend tax doesn't exist. This rolls fixed real (Bengen), Guyton-Klinger 20/10 guardrails, and VPW across every start year since 1928, then converts gross withdrawals to net-spendable with 2026 IRS brackets — where taxable accounts pay capital-gains tax on the gain portion only. Every output is a range.
Three strategies, one table
all figures are ranges, real (today's) dollars| Fixed real (Bengen) | GK 20/10 guardrails | VPW |
|---|
Success = the portfolio covers every scheduled withdrawal through the horizon. VPW shows 100% by construction — it withdraws a percentage of whatever is left, so its risk lands in the “lowest real year” row instead. Compare the income-floor row, not just the success row.
Ending balance after the horizon
real $ · p5 · median · p95Fixed real (Bengen)
GK 20/10 guardrails
VPW
Coral = 5th-percentile, aqua = median, mint = 95th-percentile ending balance in today's dollars. VPW ends near zero by design — it spends the portfolio down over the horizon rather than leaving a bequest.
Show the math ›
Assumptions & sources ›
| Assumption | Value | Source · asOf |
|---|---|---|
| Equity return | S&P 500 total return | Damodaran (NYU Stern), annual · asOf 2026-01 · dividends reinvested |
| Fixed-income sleeve | 3-month T-bill | Damodaran (NYU Stern) · asOf 2026-01 · more conservative than the intermediate Treasuries in Bengen's study — disclosed, not hidden |
| Inflation | CPI-U, Dec/Dec | BLS · asOf 2026-01 · drives the fixed-real and GK inflation step and all real-dollar output |
| Federal tax, 2026 | brackets + standard deduction | IRS Rev. Proc. 2025-32 · asOf 2025-10 · ordinary tables for traditional, 0/15/20 LTCG for taxable-account gains; withdrawal assumed to be the only income; state tax and NIIT out of scope (v1) |
| Guardrail rules | ±20% band, 10% adjust | Guyton & Klinger, Journal of Financial Planning · asOf 2006-03 · capital-preservation + prosperity rules only; the paper's inflation-cap and portfolio-management rules are omitted for transparency |
| VPW percentage | p = r / (1 − (1+r)−n) | Bogleheads wiki (PMT formula) · r = geometric-mean real return of your mix over 1928–2025, net of your fee — derived from the dataset, not a forward-looking guess |
| Mechanics | start-of-year withdrawal, annual rebalance | coverage 1928–2025; real withdrawals taxed against 2026 tables (the standard “brackets keep pace with inflation” assumption) |
Rolling windows are overlapping start years, so they are not independent samples — a p5 across the windows is an illustrative historical range, not a probability of the future. Sequence risk is the point: the same average return with a bad first decade (1966-style, 2000-style) is what breaks a plan.
Related
- Guide: what is a safe withdrawal rate
The 4% study and what moves the number in practice.
- Sequence-of-returns risk
Why the order of returns decides whether money lasts.
- How long will my money last
Depletion age as a range, three engines.
- Methodology
How the backtest engine and data layers are built.